It seems you’re referring to the specific concept of “New Gravity” as outlined on the website newgravity.co.uk. Based on the information from that site, here’s what I can tell you about their take on gravity: “New Gravity” is presented as an alternative theory about the nature and origin of gravity, distinct from mainstream scientific models like Newton’s law of universal gravitation or Einstein’s general relativity. The core idea is that gravity isn’t an attraction
between masses, as traditionally understood, but rather a “pull on space itself” caused by the spin of space. According to this view, space is eternal and has always existed, even before the formation of matter. The motion or spin of this space is proposed as the fundamental energy that creates and sustains particles, galaxies, and the universe as we know it.

The theory suggests that all matter, no matter how dense, is mostly empty space—less than a millionth of 1% of it is “real” material. This empty space, far from being nothing, is the primary building block of everything. The spin of space generates gravity, which in turn drives the formation of particles and larger structures like stars and galaxies. For example, they argue that the gravitational force observed in phenomena like starlight bending near a massive object (e.g., a star) results from space flowing toward that object, not from mass attracting mass. Similarly, the cohesion of galaxies is attributed to the angular momentum induced by this spinning space, with a concentrated effect at galactic centers explaining their energetic activity.

This model also rejects the Big Bang theory, proposing instead that the universe has always been its current size, with no initial singularity. It challenges conventional explanations like dark matter by suggesting that the mechanics of spinning space account for observed gravitational effects without needing unseen mass. Other forces, like magnetism and electricity, are described as secondary effects of this same spin—e.g., magnetism as the alignment of spinning electrons, and electric current as a wave of motion through stationary electrons rather than their physical movement.

The site emphasizes that this is a mechanical explanation of gravity, unlike mainstream theories which, according to them, don’t describe how gravity works at a fundamental level. They invoke Occam’s Razor, arguing that their simpler explanation— relying solely on the spin of eternal space—might be more likely correct than complex models involving unseen entities like dark matter or a cosmic origin point.

This “New Gravity” concept, developed since 1987 according to the site, also claims to address anomalies like Mercury’s orbital precession or galaxy collisions in ways that differ from standard cosmology, though it doesn’t alter Newton’s mathematical calculations—just their interpretation. It’s a bold departure from established physics, leaning heavily on the idea that space itself is dynamic and energetic, not a passive backdrop. Does this align with what you were curious about? If you want me to dig into a specific aspect of their theory—like how they explain a particular phenomenon—let me know!